The Trump administration’s 2025 trade policy has presented a challenge for U.S. medical device manufacturers: how to respond to escalating tariffs on imports from China without compromising competitiveness, continuity, or compliance.
But this time, we’re not seeing a unified response. Instead, device makers are taking sharply diverging paths. Some are aggressively shifting manufacturing footprints, while others are choosing to wait out the policy cycle and avoid locking into costly changes. If you’re leading operations or managing global supply chains, this moment presents a fundamental question: how resilient is your current strategy if trade disruption becomes the norm, not the exception?
Strategic Localizers: Building U.S. Capacity for Long-Term Stability
Abbott and Johnson & Johnson are wasting no time. Abbott is investing $500 million into expanding its U.S. manufacturing base in Illinois and Texas. J&J announced a 25 percent boost in U.S. investment, earmarking over $55 billion across four years to strengthen domestic production and R&D.
Even if these moves aren’t directly linked to tariffs, they reflect a broader operational pivot: building localized infrastructure to reduce exposure to geopolitical volatility. These companies are treating localization not just as risk mitigation but as a strategic differentiator.
As GlobalData Senior Medical Analyst Ashley Clarke notes, “These capital-heavy moves align with a broader trend toward self-reliance in U.S. markets. Companies are proactively safeguarding revenue streams in the world’s largest medical device market.”
Managing Impact Without Structural Change
Contrast that with GE HealthCare and Stryker. GE expects a $475 million EBIT impact next year — 75 percent from U.S.-China tariffs — but it’s holding steady on capital strategy. Instead, it’s turning inward: optimizing automation, improving productivity, and maintaining a strong R&D pipeline. Stryker is following a similar playbook, expecting a $200 million tariff hit but avoiding operational shifts for now.
This strategy is about buying time. The assumption is that policy will stabilize before supply chains need to be rebuilt. But as Clarke cautions, “This leaves them more vulnerable if tariffs remain in place.” For manufacturers without robust geographic flexibility, the price of inaction could compound over time.
Keeping Options Open While Margins Improve
Medtronic, for its part, has already executed significant restructuring, closing more than a dozen manufacturing and distribution sites globally in 2024. But its 2025 play is to pause, monitor trade tensions, and optimize within its current footprint.
This is calculated flexibility. Medtronic has demonstrated it can move aggressively when needed, but it’s resisting another wave of capital reallocation until there’s more policy clarity. It’s a model that may appeal to manufacturers with complex product portfolios and long validation cycles.
What This Means for Medtech Strategy Teams
Tariffs are no longer just a financial nuisance. They’re a strategic inflection point. For device makers, they influence more than sourcing: they’re shaping capital deployment, regulatory strategy, quality assurance workflows, and speed to market.
Localized manufacturing isn’t just a hedge. It’s becoming a competitive advantage in a world of constant policy flux. Delaying operational change can preserve capital but increases exposure to prolonged disruption. Balanced models, like Medtronic’s, show that there’s room for strategic patience but only if supported by deep operational agility.
As trade pressures grow, medical device manufacturers will need to decide: are we building for resilience or waiting for relief? Your answer may define your margin, your compliance posture, and your global competitiveness over the next decade.
This article was written by Sherrie Trigg. She can be reached at