Scientists have developed a special protective membrane made of cellulose that significantly reduces the buildup of fibrotic tissue around cardiac pacemaker implants, as reported in a recent issue of the journal Biomaterials.1 The protective membrane could greatly simplify surgical procedures for patients with cardiac pacemakers.

A cellulose membrane for protecting pacemakers. (Credit: Hylomorph)

“Every pacemaker has to be replaced at some point. When this time comes, typically after about five years when the device’s battery expires, the patient has to undergo surgery,” explains Aldo Ferrari, senior scientist in ETH Prof. Dimos Poulikakos’s group and at Empa. “If too much fibrotic tissue has formed around the pacemaker, it complicates the procedure,” he explains. In such cases, the surgeon has to cut into and remove this excess tissue. Not only does that prolong the operation, it also increases the risk of complications such as infection.

Microstructure Reduces Fibrotic Tissue Formation

To overcome this issue, Ferrari and his colleagues at ETH Zurich spent the last few years developing a membrane with a special surface structure that is less conducive to the growth of fibrotic tissue than the smooth metal surface of pacemakers. This membrane has now been patented, and Ferrari is working with fellow researchers at the Wyss Zurich research center, the University of Zurich, and the German Center of Cardiovascular Research in Berlin to make it market ready for use in patients.

The membrane is made of cellulose fibers with a diameter of a few dozen nanometers (electron microscope image). (Credit: Robotti, F. et al. Biomaterials 2019)

As part of this process, the consortium has now tested the membrane on pigs. In each pig, the scientists implanted two pacemakers, one of which was enveloped in the cellulose membrane.

Following the one-year test period, the researchers can report positive results: the pigs’ bodies tolerate the membrane and do not reject it. “This is an important finding because tolerance is a core requirement for implant materials,” Ferrari says. Just as importantly, the membrane did what it was supposed to: the fibrotic tissue that formed around it was, on average, only a third as thick as the tissue that formed around the unencapsulated pacemakers.

The membrane surface contains indentations with a diameter of 10 μm. (Credit: Robotti, F. et al. Biomaterials 2019)

Next Step: Clinical Trials

The scientists attribute this reduction in fibrotic tissue formation in the first stage to the material itself — cellulose is fibrous by nature.

“When fibrotic tissue forms, the first stage is the deposition of proteins on the surface. A fibrous membrane surface impedes this process,” says Francesco Robotti, lead author of the study and a scientist in ETH Professor Poulikakos’s group.

Another factor is that the researchers created the membrane with honeycomb-like indentations in the surface, each measuring 10 μm in diameter.

“These indentations make it difficult for the cells that form fibrotic tissue to adhere to the surface — the second stage in the formation processes,” Robotti says.

Now that the material has proved successful in animal trials, the scientists plan to apply for approval for clinical trials in humans in partnership with the ETH spin-off Hylomorph, which will be responsible for commercialization of the membrane. The trials are slated to start next year at three large cardiac centers in Germany.

This work was carried out as part of University Medicine Zurich’s flagship Zurich Heart project and ETH+ project ETHeart.

Reference

  1. Robotti F, Sterner I, Bottan S, Monné Rodríguez JM, Pellegrini G, Schmidt T, Falk V, Poulikakos D, Ferrari A, Starck C: Microengineered biosynthesized cellulose as anti-fibrotic in vivo protection for cardiac implantable electronic devices, Biomaterials 2019, 229: 119583, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119583.

This article was written by Fabio Bergamin, ETH Zürich. For more information, visit here .


Medical Design Briefs Magazine

This article first appeared in the January, 2020 issue of Medical Design Briefs Magazine.

Read more articles from this issue here.

Read more articles from the archives here.