University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, NY
Researchers’ success in pinpointing a drug therapy inside the body, at the cellular level, proved to be a highly efficient drug-delivery method. (Credit: kitidach/AdobeStock)

Harnessing nanoparticles to deliver drugs precisely to a surgically repaired tendon is a promising new approach that reduced scar tissue formation and improved mechanical function in a study appearing in Science Advances. Researchers’ success in pinpointing a drug therapy inside the body, at the cellular level, proved to be a highly efficient delivery method that could be used to treat other injuries.

Whether it’s a season-ending Achilles rupture by pro footballer Aaron Rodgers or an everyday workplace accident, tendon injuries are common and can be life-changing. They require 300,000 surgeries per year and often result in lost work time and permanent impaired physical function.

Typically, traumatic tendon injuries are surgically repaired with sutures, but optimal healing is often impaired by the tendon’s propensity to heal with scar tissue that restricts tendon movement and function.

Researchers at the University of Rochester and University of Oregon combined their expertise in tendon cell biology and drug-delivery systems to find a better way to deliver therapies that can reduce scar tissue and facilitate improved healing.

“There are very few effective drug regimens to assist the tendon healing process, despite the high number of these injuries and the poor outcomes that often result,” says Alayna Loiselle, PhD, associate professor at the University of Rochester’s Center for Musculoskeletal Research. “Systemic drug treatments delivered orally or via injection show poor tendon homing; in some cases, less than 1 percent of a systemically delivered medication reaches the healing tendon. Local administration of drugs directly to the tendon has disadvantages as well, including potential tissue damage from the injection and poor control over drug concentrations at the point of injury.”

“We want to pivot from using suturing alone to incorporating therapeutics,” says Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, a biomedical engineering PhD student at the University of Rochester, who has spent the past several years working with co-authors Loiselle, Danielle S.W. Benoit, PhD, and others to develop the nanoparticle delivery system to improve healing in tendon injuries. “Advances in multiomics and drug delivery using nanoparticles open up new possibilities in treatment.”

The challenge for researchers was to identify which substances could assist tendon healing.

Molecular ‘Map’ Charts a New Therapeutic Path

“The fundamental cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive scar-mediated tendon healing are really only just beginning to be well-defined,” Loiselle says. “Our prior work used spatial transcriptomic profiling to define a molecular map of the healing tendon. In subsequent analysis of this data, we found that the area right at the injury site had high levels of Acp5 gene expression, which was both surprising and exciting.”

The Acp5 gene produces a protein called Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP); both are known to occur as injured bones recover and rebuild. High TRAP activity within the healing tendon allowed researchers to employ a peptide that binds with TRAP to deliver medication directly to the healing tendon site.

“While Benoit’s lab has previously used TRAP-binding peptide nanoparticles (TBP-NP) for targeted drug delivery to bone, high TRAP activity in the healing tendon opened up an entirely new research direction,” Loiselle says.

Prior to initiating studies with therapeutic agents, the team completed a series of dose and timing studies, using a mouse model of complete transection and surgical repair of the flexor tendon, to define the window in which their drug-delivery system could most effectively target the healing tendon.

“Defining an optimal treatment window is critical to successfully developing an innovative and effective drug delivery system that improves tendon healing by encouraging a more regenerative, rather than fibrotic, healing cascade,” says Benoit, the Lorry Lokey Department Chair and Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Oregon. “In addition, by defining the optimal therapeutic window for this drug delivery system, we can mitigate the unwanted side effects that typically accompany the high doses or multiple doses required to achieve sufficient drug accumulation in the tissue.”

As a therapeutic, the team chose Niclosamide, which inhibits S100a4, a protein that Loiselle’s lab already identified as contributing to scar formation. Previous work from Loiselle’s lab demonstrated that genetic knockdown of S100a4 improved mechanical and functional outcomes in this mouse tendon healing model. S100a4 has been implicated in scar formation in many tissues, including the liver, heart, lung, and oral submucosa; Loiselle’s discovery that it complicates tendon healing gave them a therapeutic target for this study, where they used their TRAP-binding peptide nanoparticle drug delivery system to precisely affect the injured tendon.

As a comparison, they delivered Niclosamide systemically; it did slightly reduce the amount of S100a4 in the healing tendon but it had no beneficial impact on the healing process. In contrast, delivery of the same dose of Niclosamide using the nanoparticle system resulted in robust inhibition of S100a4 mRNA and protein levels in the healing tendon.

This targeted drug delivery method also significantly benefited the tendon healing process. TBP-NP delivery of Niclosamide improved both functional range of motion recovery and increased the mechanical integrity of the healing tendon across both short- and longer-term time points. Importantly, these sustained effects occurred with just a single treatment.

Researchers will continue their work to define how broadly the system can be used for other tendon injuries and disease, as well as other types of tissue injury that result in scar formation.

“The beauty of this system is that it can be loaded with different kinds of drugs to target different molecular processes or pathways,” says Adjei-Sowah.

This article was written by Barbara Ficarra, University of Rochester. For more information, contact Alayna E. Loiselle at 585-275-7239, or visit here  .