Advantages of Manufacturing Silicone Drug-Eluting Components via Ultraviolet Light Vulcanization Process
Combination products offer several advantages when compared with drug delivery via oral, injection, and infusion methods. All drug-device type combination products exhibit one or more of the following attributes. First, they provide controlled release of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) instead of bolus-type delivery; API concentrations can be consistently maintained within an optimal therapeutic range. Second, drug-eluting devices, particularly implanted devices, allow for a targeted delivery of the API. This targeted approach, when contrasted with systemic administration, permits higher therapeutic dosages to be delivered while minimizing adverse side effects. Third, combination products have been shown to improve patient compliance. Most healthcare practitioners now agree that within our aging population, compliance becomes less certain and therefore more important.
Silicone: Pros and Cons as Drug-Eluting Matrix
As a class of biomaterials, silicones offer the combination product designer several unique advantages over other materials. First, silicones, specifically elastomers, have a long history of use in the body. Biocompatibility and biostability of silicones have been well established in over 50 years of human implantation. Second, polymers and filler can be modified such that specific drugs will release at specific rates. Third, because of their helical conformation and weak intermolecular attraction, silicone elastomers exhibit high free volume. This in turn contributes to the exceptional permeability of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomers. It has been shown that silicone elastomers are 25 times more permeable to oxygen than natural rubber and over 4000 times more permeable than polyvinylchloride. Compared with polyethylene, silicone is 1000 times more permeable to progesterone.
Despite these positive attributes, the fabrication of silicone drug components can be challenging. The advantages of UV-initiated vulcanization can be best appreciated when compared with other types of silicone cure systems currently used in healthcare applications.
In the broadest sense, silicones can be divided into two groups: those that must be heat-cured and a second group that vulcanizes at room temperature, commonly referred to as RTVs. RTVs are typically tin-catalyzed and include acetoxy, alkoxy, and oxime cure systems. Cure times are generally quite slow, from 30 minutes for alkoxy materials to 72 hours for acetoxy, and vary depending on part geometry and ambient conditions. Physical properties are marginal and in most cases, if not encapsulated, RTVs are insufficiently durable for implantation.
Thermally cured silicones include platinum and peroxide systems. Both systems can be formulated to produce elastomers with excellent physical properties. Peroxide systems must be heated to temperatures that are sufficient to cause free radical formation of the peroxide initiator. Vulcanization temperatures of 200 °C are typical. Platinum-catalyzed systems, also referred to as addition systems, vulcanize via hydrosilation, whereby hydrogen on a crosslinker reacts with vinyl groups on other polymer chains. The reaction is heat-accelerated and cure temperatures of 150 °C are common. Platinum-catalyzed systems can be formulated to cure at lower or even room temperature but reaction rates are reduced. The dependence of reaction rate on temperature agrees well with the Arrhenius equation. Reaction rates are doubled for a temperature increase of 10 °C.
Many active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are altered at elevated temperatures. While platinum-catalyzed silicones may be vulcanized at various time/temperature parameters, low temperature fabrication, molding for example, may require such lengthy cycle times as to be economically non-viable. The purpose of this research was to demonstrate that a material and process have been developed that address the silicone drug vulcanization challenges inherent in currently available RTVs and thermal cure materials.
Research Objectives
This research had 5 primary objectives: (1) Demonstrate the ability to vulcanize silicone elastomers containing various API at various concentrations using UV light; (2) For one of the API, dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP), vulcanize via both UV and thermal processes, and compare and contrast; (3) Produce test articles, cylindrical plugs, from silicone-DSP sheets vulcanized via both UV and thermal process; (4) Perform API elution rate analysis on both sets of DSP test articles; (5) Confirm that UV and thermal curing processes leave DSP unaltered.
Test Methodology UV Vulcanization
Attention then focused on developing a molding process. Rather than mold individual plugs, the team focused on forming and vulcanizing a slab from which plugs could be removed via a punching process. This process eventually proved very effective in producing representative test articles for both UV and thermal vulcanization. (See Fig. 1)


